The Anglish Moot

'tis moot speaking, one of the main oferseers of this moot.

ic be making this writ to scow ge hwat a greeting made by newbies may be like.

-----

hello eferybody. ic be moot, a nameless leed hwoe beeth here to ofersee things, and to keep this board's welfare sicker! as for sume fun things to know me for, ic like brooking "ic" in mine anglisc, it is a great old word that ic bring forth to tie anglisc to other west germanisc tungs. btw, like ge the way ic write anglisc? be it bewildering, or hard to understand whollic?

more things ic like

my fondest blee be blow, soothlic a wunderful blee to behold in mine eyes. writing anglisc be a fun deed too, hwen written by hand it is efen more a wunder than sume staffs beheld on the looking glass of a reckoner.

toward thouhts

ic wuld like for this fellowscip to blossom into a great hub for anglisc mooting, so ic hope to see more folks cume by and moot here, 'tis one of my few wisces for this board.

I mostly like þy way of writing Anglisc and I find þy words eaþ to understand, but I find "þ" muc better þan "th". I þink it wuld be good efen in New Englisc.

I wonder if ASCII wuld have "þ" in a world hwere Anglisc is þe widely spoken Englisc. "q", "j", "z" or "v" culd be swapped ute for it. Howefer, Anglisc has muc less loanwords þan New Englisc, hwic culd lead to anoþer tung's staffrow being ceosen for ASCII.

Wend: "ute", not "out".

xyzzy51273 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 8:48 pm I mostly like þy way of writing Anglisc and I find þy words eaþ to understand, but I find "þ" muc better þan "th". I þink it wuld be good efen in New Englisc.

I wonder if ASCII wuld have "þ" in a world hwere Anglisc is þe widely spoken Englisc. "q", "j", "z" or "v" culd be swapped out for it. Howefer, Anglisc has muc less loanwords þan New Englisc, hwic culd lead to anoþer tung's staffrow being ceosen for ASCII.

thanks for thine ancweath! as for hwy ic brook not "þ", ic know not, mayhaps it beeth forthat ic be too slothful to input the key eace time ic write.

[ancweath] response, comment

update: i could have used "answer" instead, woops!